On 2016-04-09 22:38:31 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> There are results with 5364b357 reverted.
Crazy that this has such a negative impact. Amit, can you reproduce
that? Alexander, I guess for r/w workload 5364b357 is a benefit on that
machine as well?
> It's much closer to what we had before.
I'm going to apply this later then. If there's some micro optimization
for large x86, we can look into that later.
Greetings,
Andres Freund