Re: [HACKERS] Change GetLastImportantRecPtr's definition? (wasSkipcheckpoints, archiving on idle systems.)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Change GetLastImportantRecPtr's definition? (wasSkipcheckpoints, archiving on idle systems.)
Дата
Msg-id 20170505062736.2latenw7cd7tdn67@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Change GetLastImportantRecPtr's definition? (wasSkipcheckpoints, archiving on idle systems.)  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Change GetLastImportantRecPtr's definition? (wasSkipcheckpoints, archiving on idle systems.)  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2017-05-05 11:50:12 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I see that EndPos can be updated in one of the cases after releasing
> the lock (refer below code). Won't that matter?

I can't see how it'd in the cases that'd matter for
GetLastImportantRecPtr() - but it'd probably good to note it in the
comment.

Thanks,

Andres



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Time based lag tracking for logical replication