Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes
Дата
Msg-id 20170508165310.vboap2fnfno7s3a3@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pgbench tap tests & minor fixes  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Fabien COELHO wrote:
> 
> Here is a v3, with less files. I cannot say I find it better, but it still
> works.
> 
> The "command_likes" function has been renamed "command_checks".

Do parts of this need to be backpatched?  I notice that you're patching
pgbench.c, probably to fix some bug(s); is the idea that we would
backpatch all the new tests on whatever old branches need the bugfixes
too?  If so, how far back do the fixes need to go?

ISTM TestLib::command_checks() needs a comment explaining what it does.
Its API seems pretty opaque.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Debian "postgresql-common" config check issue with pg10