Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)

Thomas Munro wrote:

> Recall that transition tables can be specified for statement-level
> triggers AND row-level triggers.  If you specify them for row-level
> triggers, then they can see all rows changed so far each time they
> fire.

Uhmm ... why do we do this?  It seems like a great way to cause much
confusion.  Shouldn't we see the transition table containing the whole
set for statement-level triggers only, and give row-level triggers just
the individual affected row each time?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services