Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect
Дата
Msg-id 20180502061452.GA1723@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:38:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Perhaps, I'm just repeating what's already been said, but I think it might
> be better to have the word "partitioned" in the message.

That's what Peter is pointing to upthread and what the v1 of upthread
was doing.  I would tend to think to just keep the code simple and don't
add those extra checks, but I am fine to be beaten as well.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A few warnings on Windows
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported