Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work
Дата
Msg-id 20180813152712.u2jnag6jv7x5rkor@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On 2018-08-13 11:22:11 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> * Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
> > On August 13, 2018 4:59:32 PM GMT+02:00, Phil Endecott <spam_from_pgsql_lists@chezphil.org> wrote:
> >  but in general, I think it's still
> > >possible
> > >that the master will remove the segment that is needed to start
> > >streaming.
> > 
> > That's why I told you about replication slots....
> 
> This should really work even without replication slots though.

Why? I fail to see what'd be gained by adding "always retain one
segment" rule. It'd not make the setup any more reliable. If anything
it'd make it harder to spot issues in test setups.

- Andres


В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work