Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 06:49:26PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Michael Paquier (michael@paquier.xyz) wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:20:15AM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Attached is a patch with more comments about the intents of the test
>>> suite, and the separate issue pointed out by Tom fixed. It seems to me
>>> that actually checking the contents of pg_init_privs would improve the
>>> reason why the test exists.. I would welcome input about this last
>>> point.
>>
>> So, Stephen, any input to offer? This has been around for the last
>> three weeks. I am tracking this thread in the section for older bugs in
>> v11 open items.
>
> It's on my list of things to look at and hope to do so soon.
So it has already been two months. Do you have any input to offer or
should I do the cleanup myself? If none, then I still propose my
cleanup patch from upthread, and I propose to apply it within the next
couple of days if there are no objections.
The annoying part about this stuff is that when running tests on Windows
we get failures after multiple runs on the same installed instance, and
the module is not marked with NO_INSTALLCHECK. I just got annoyed by
that test a portion of this week to test some other patch with MSVC as
well :(
--
Michael