Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line
Дата
Msg-id 20191030063209.mr2ksylefsrcbu6z@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line  (Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>)
Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2019-10-29 16:31:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > one of the most frequent conflicts I see is that two patches add files
> > to OBJS (or one of its other spellings), and there are conflicts because
> > another file has been added.
> > ...
> > Now, obviously these types of conflicts are easy enough to resolve, but
> > it's still annoying.  It seems that this would be substantially less
> > often a problem if we just split such lines to one file per
> > line.
> 
> We did something similar not too long ago in configure.in (bfa6c5a0c),
> and it seems to have helped.  +1

Cool. Any opinion on whether to got for

OBJS = \
    dest.o \
    fastpath.o \
...

or

OBJS = dest.o \
    fastpath.o \
...

I'm mildly inclined to go for the former.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: lingce.ldm
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Problem with synchronous replication
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line