Re: [postgis-devel] About EXTENSION from UNPACKAGED on PostgreSQL 13

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: [postgis-devel] About EXTENSION from UNPACKAGED on PostgreSQL 13
Дата
Msg-id 20200226153741.GE3195@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [postgis-devel] About EXTENSION from UNPACKAGED on PostgreSQL 13  (Sandro Santilli <strk@kbt.io>)
Ответы Re: [postgis-devel] About EXTENSION from UNPACKAGED on PostgreSQL 13  (Sandro Santilli <strk@kbt.io>)
Re: [postgis-devel] About EXTENSION from UNPACKAGED on PostgreSQL 13  (Paul Ramsey <pramsey@cleverelephant.ca>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Greetings,

* Sandro Santilli (strk@kbt.io) wrote:
> On pgsql-hackers we only want to find a future-proof way to "package
> existing objects into an extension".  If the syntax
> `CREATE EXTENSION <extname> FROM UNPACKAGED`
> has gone, would it be ok for just:
> `CREATE EXTENSION <extname>`
> to intercept unpackaged objects and package them ?

No.  The reason it was removed is because it's not going to be safe to
do when we have trusted extensions.  Perhaps it would be possible to
figure out a way to make it safe, but the reason FROM UNPACKAGED was
created and existed doesn't apply any more.  That PostGIS has been using
it for something else entirely is unfortunate, but the way to address
what PostGIS needs is to talk about that, not talk about how this ugly
hack used to work and doesn't any more.

Thanks,

Stephen

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Commit fest manager for 2020-03