Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10and system performance is not so good

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Julien Rouhaud
Тема Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10and system performance is not so good
Дата
Msg-id 20200404070638.ytfi2lwaxd5sr662@nol
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10and system performance is not so good  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Once again, please don't top post.

On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 11:57:02AM +0530, Tejaswini GC wrote:
> Hello Julien,
> 
> The procedure for doing the upgrade is different for AWS.
> 


And is it possible to know what the procedure was?


> 
> After the PG upgrade we can see many locks in our system we believe this is
> the main reason for the issue we are facing,
> I can see these locks when using pg_stat_activity.
> 


Any more details?  Are you talking of heavyweight locks or lightweight locks?
Since version 9.6 both are visible in pg_stat_activity.


> Along with that few queries which were executing within millisecond are
> taking more than few hours.
> 


Please follow https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions to provide
more details.



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tejaswini GC
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16334: We recently upgraded PG version from 9.5 to 10.10 andsystem performance is not so good
Следующее
От: Arya F
Дата:
Сообщение: Postgresql 12, 512 partition by hash. Slow select