Re: BUG #16594: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY fails on partitioned table with a non helpful error message.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: BUG #16594: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY fails on partitioned table with a non helpful error message.
Дата
Msg-id 20200829013433.GA1529@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16594: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY fails on partitioned table with a non helpful error message.  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: BUG #16594: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY fails on partitioned table with a non helpful error message.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: BUG #16594: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY fails on partitioned table with a non helpful error message.  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 08:22:42AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, adding that to RemoveRelations() makes sense.  Thanks for the
> patch.

I got some room to test the patch, and the place of the check looks
good to me.  I think that I would move the new check before we set
PERFORM_DELETION_CONCURRENTLY for non-temporary relations though, as a
partition tree can be temporary as long as all its members are
temporary.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16600: Postgres can't upper lower diacritic character of Croatina alfabet
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUG] plpgsql RETURN QUERY with toasted fields -vs- DROP/TRUNCATE