On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:34:10AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > [ assorted nits ]
fixed, I think.
> At the level of bikeshedding ... I quite dislike using the name "popcount"
> for these functions. I'm aware that some C compilers provide primitives
> of that name, but I wouldn't expect a SQL programmer to know that;
> without that context the name seems pretty random and unintuitive.
> Moreover, it invites confusion with SQL's use of "pop" to abbreviate
> "population" in the statistical aggregates, such as var_pop().
>
> Perhaps something along the lines of count_ones() or count_set_bits()
> would be more apropos.
Done that way.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate