At Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:40:59 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:25:37AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > It looks like we are not getting any consensus on this approach. One
> > reduced version I would consider is just the second part, so you'd write
> > something like
> >
> > snprintf(lsnchar, sizeof(lsnchar), "%X/%X",
> > LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(lsn));
> >
> > This would still reduce notational complexity quite a bit but avoid any
> > funny business with the format strings.
>
> That seems reasonable to me. So +1.
That seems in the good balance. +1, too.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center