Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes
Дата
Msg-id 20210323182850.GA22408@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Mar-23, Tomas Vondra wrote:

> FWIW there's yet another difference between the current BRIN opclass
> definition, compared to what CREATE OPERATOR CLASS would do. Or more
> precisely, how we'd define opfamily for the cross-type cases (integer,
> float and timestamp cases).
> 
> AFAICS we don't really need pg_amproc entries for the cross-type cases,
> we just need the operators, so pg_amproc entries like
> 
> { amprocfamily => 'brin/datetime_minmax_ops', amproclefttype =>
> 'timestamptz',
>   amprocrighttype => 'timestamp', amprocnum => '1',
>   amproc => 'brin_minmax_opcinfo' },
> 
> are unnecessary. The attached patch cleans that up, without breaking any
> regression tests. Or is there a reason why we need those?

... ooh ...

When you say "just the operators" you mean the pg_amop entries, right?

I think I agree -- cross-type amproc entries are unlikely to have any
use.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Change default of checkpoint_completion_target