Re: storing an explicit nonce

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: storing an explicit nonce
Дата
Msg-id 20210525211725.GL3048@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: storing an explicit nonce  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: storing an explicit nonce  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 05:15:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > We already discussed that there are too many other ways to break system
> > integrity that are not encrypted/integrity-checked, e.g., changes to
> > clog.  Do you disagree?
> 
> We had agreed that this wasn't something that was strictly required in
> the first version and I continue to agree with that.  On the other hand,
> if we decide that we ultimately need to use an independent nonce and
> further that we can make room in the special space for it, then it's
> trivial to also include the tag and we absolutely should (or make it
> optional to do so) in that case.

Well, if we can't really say the data has integrity, what does the
validation bytes accomplish?  And if are going to encrypt everything
that would allow integrity, we need to encrypt almost the entire file
system.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: storing an explicit nonce
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: storing an explicit nonce