On 2021-Aug-23, Robert Haas wrote:
> It's also a bit unfair to say, well we have APIs for accessing GUC
> values. It's true that we do. But if the GUC variable is, say, a
> Boolean, you do not want your extension to call some function that
> does a bunch of shenanigans and returns a string so that you can then
> turn around and parse the string to recover the Boolean value. Even
> moreso if the value is an integer or a comma-separated list. You want
> to access the value as the system represents it internally, not
> duplicate the parsing logic in a way that is inefficient and
> bug-prone.
In that case, why not improve the API with functions that return the
values in some native datatype? For scalars with native C types (int,
floats, Boolean etc) this is easy enough; I bet it'll solve 99% of the
problems or more.
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/