On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:22:38AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 03:03, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately this is a known limitation.
>
> I see this as a beneficial feature.
>
> If the same SQL is executed against different sets of tables, each
> with different indexes, probably different data, the performance could
> vary dramatically and might need different tuning on each. So having
> separate rows in the pg_stat_statements output makes sense.
Yes, having different rows seems like a good thing. But being unable to tell
which row apply to which schema is *not* a good thing.
> > There were some previous discussions (e.g. [1] and [2] more recently), but I
> > don't think there was a real consensus on how to solve that problem.
>
> To differentiate, run each schema using a different user, so you can
> tell them apart.
This isn't always possible. For instance, once you reach enough schema it will
be problematic to do proper pooling.