Hi,
On 2022-02-16 09:18:53 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Yeah I mentioned this problem in the other thread. I got as far as
> finding this write-up:
>
> https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html
Given that major parts of llvm (clang alone contains ~1k references) aren't
yet transitioned, I wonder if should silence them for now?
> I haven't yet tried to work out what we really need to do, but I'm
> planning to try. Possibly requires a bit more book keeping on our
> part, since eg LLVMGetElementType() is going away.
I can't yet really tell whether it'll be simpler because pointer types aren't
a thing anymore, or harder because the llvmjit_types.c mechanism won't work
well anymore.
Greetings,
Andres Freund