Hi,
On 2022-05-19 21:42:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > seq_scan|seq_tup_read|n_tup_ins|n_tup_upd|n_tup_del|n_live_tup|n_dead_tup|vacuum_count
> > --------+------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+----------+------------
> > - 3| 9| 5| 1| 0| 1| 1| 0
> > + 3| 9| 5| 1| 0| 4| 1| 0
> > (1 row)
> Even more interesting, the repeatability varies with the settings
> of max_connections and max_prepared_transactions.
That is indeed quite odd.
> At low values (resp. 20 and 0) I've not been able to make it happen at all,
> but at 100 and 2 it happens circa three times out of four.
Is this the only permutation that fails?
Greetings,
Andres Freund