On 2022-Jul-21, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:01 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > I've got no opinions on this. I don't like either 1 or 3, so I'm going
> > to add and backpatch a new GUC allow_recovery_tablespaces as the
> > override mechanism.
> >
> > If others disagree with this choice, please speak up.
>
> Would it help if we back-patched the allow_in_place_tablespaces stuff?
> I'm not sure how hard/destabilising that would be, but I could take a
> look tomorrow.
Yeah, I think that would reduce cruft. I'm not sure this is more
against backpatching policy or less, compared to adding a separate
GUC just for this bugfix.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"The problem with the facetime model is not just that it's demoralizing, but
that the people pretending to work interrupt the ones actually working."
(Paul Graham)