On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:46:48PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Okay, I think it's basically in good shape. Since it should be a bit
> faster than a couple versions ago, would you be up for retesting with
> the original test having 8 to 512 writers?
Sure thing. The results are similar. As before, the improvements are most
visible when the arrays are large.
writers head patch
8 672 680
16 639 664
32 701 689
64 705 703
128 628 653
256 576 627
512 530 584
768 450 536
1024 350 494
> And also add the const
> markers we discussed upthread?
Oops, sorry about that. This is done in v9.
> Aside from that, I plan to commit this
> week unless there is further bikeshedding.
Great, thanks.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com