Hi,
On 2022-08-23 13:18:49 -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> Taking RMT hat off, if the outcome is "revert", I do want to ensure we don't
> lose momentum on getting this into v16. I know a lot of time and effort has
> gone into this featureset and it seems to be trending in the right
> direction. We have a mixed history on reverts in terms of if/when they are
> committed and I don't want to see that happen to these features. I do think
> this will remain a headline feature even if we delay it for v16.
We could decide to revert this for 15, but leave it in tree for HEAD.
Greetings,
Andres Freund