Hi,
On 2022-11-21 15:12:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> If I were trying to find a better fix I'd be looking for ways for
> parallel workers to be able to read the parent's temp tables.
> (Perhaps that could tie in with the blue-sky discussion we had
> the other day about allowing autovacuum on temp tables??)
That'd be a nontrivial change, because we explicitly don't use any
locking for anything relating to localbuf.c. One possible benefit could
be that we could substantially reduce the code duplication between
"normal" bufmgr.c and localbuf.c.
Greetings,
Andres Freund