Hi,
On 2022-12-06 08:47:55 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> The intent was to capture and display all the memory allocated to the
> backends, for admins/users/max_total_backend_memory/others to utilize.
It's going to be far less accurate than that. For one, there's a lot of
operating system resources, like the page table, that are going to be
ignored. We're also not going to capture allocations done directly via
malloc(). There's also copy-on-write effects that we're ignoring.
If we just want to show an accurate picture of the current memory usage, we
need to go to operating system specific interfaces.
> Why should we ignore the allocations prior to backend_status.c?
It seems to add complexity without a real increase in accuracy to me. But I'm
not going to push harder on it than I already have.
Greetings,
Andres Freund