On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:06:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 05:26:15PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > 001: still refers to "gzip", which is correct for -Fp and -Fd but not
> > for -Fc, for which it's more correct to say "zlib".
>
> Or should we begin by changing all these existing "not built with zlib
> support" error strings to the more generic "this build does not
> support compression with %s" to reduce the number of messages to
> translate? That would bring consistency with the other tools dealing
> with compression.
That's fine, but it doesn't touch on the issue I'm talking about, which
is that zlib != gzip.
BTW I noticed that that also affects the pg_dump file itself; 002
changes the file format to say "gzip", but that's wrong for -Fc, which
does not use gzip headers, which could be surprising to someone who
specified "gzip".
--
Justin