Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nathan Bossart
Тема Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit"
Дата
Msg-id 20230201043013.GA3194884@nathanxps13
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit"  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Question regarding "Make archiver process an auxiliary process. commit"  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:39:56AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I noticed that time.h is no longer needed by the archiver, so I removed
> that and fixed an indentation nitpick in the attached v2.  I'm going to set
> the commitfest entry to ready-for-committer shortly after sending this
> message.

I'm not sure why I thought time.h was no longer needed.  time() is clearly
used elsewhere in this file.  Here's a new version with that added back.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Logical replication timeout problem