On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 03:28:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hmm. This is older than the oldest version we have to support for
> pg_upgrade and co. Would it be worth switching clusterdb to use the
> parenthesized grammar, adding on the way a test for this new grammar
> flavor without a table in the TAP tests (too costly for the main
> regression test suite)?
Since all currently-supported versions require a table name for the
parenthesized syntax, this would cause v17's clusterdb to fail on older
servers when no table name is specified. That seems like a deal-breaker to
me.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com