On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 02:12:44PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> The argv elements get shuffled around many times with the
> patch. However, I couldn't find a way to decrease the count without
> resorting to a forward scan. So I've concluded the current approach
> is them most effeicient, considering the complexity.
Yeah, I'm not sure it's worth doing anything more sophisticated.
> I tried some patterns with the patch and it generates the same results
> with the glibc version.
>
> The TAP test looks fine and it catches the change.
>
> Everything looks fine to me.
Thanks for reviewing.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com