On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 08:50:28 -0600
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 11:57:18AM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:17:58 -0600
> > Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Is this guaranteed to be TOASTed for all possible page sizes?
> >
> > Should we use block_size?
> >
> > SHOW block_size \gset
> > INSERT INTO test_chunk_id(v1,v2)
> > VALUES (repeat('x', 1), repeat('x', (:block_size / 4)));
> >
> > I think this will work in various page sizes.
>
> WFM
>
> > +SHOW block_size; \gset
> > + block_size
> > +------------
> > + 8192
> > +(1 row)
>
> I think we need to remove the ';' so that the output of the query is not
> saved in the ".out" file. With that change, this test passes when Postgres
> is built with --with-blocksize=32. However, many other unrelated tests
> begin failing, so I guess this fix isn't tremendously important.
I rewrote the patch to use current_setting('block_size') instead of SHOW
and \gset as other tests do. Although some tests are failing with block_size=32,
I wonder it is a bit better to use "block_size" instead of the constant
to make the test more general to some extent.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
>
> --
> Nathan Bossart
> Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>