Re: [BUGS] BUG #14850: Implement optinal additinal parameter for 'justify' date/time function

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От KES
Тема Re: [BUGS] BUG #14850: Implement optinal additinal parameter for 'justify' date/time function
Дата
Msg-id 207501507802466@web37j.yandex.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] BUG #14850: Implement optinal additinal parameter for'justify' date/time function  (Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-bugs
No. Your example work only for those values.

Try this:
SELECT extract( month from justify_days( timestamp '2016-02-29' -timestamp '2016-01-31') );date_part 
-----------        0
(1 row)

select extract( month from justify_days( timestamp '2016-02-29' -timestamp '2016-01-31'), timestamp '2016-01-31'
);date_part
-----------        1
(1 row)

12.10.2017, 12:15, "Arthur Zakirov" <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:35:12AM +0000, kes-kes@yandex.ru wrote:
>>  >Adjust interval so 30-day time periods are represented as months
>>
>>  https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/functions-datetime.html
>
> Yes, it seems that it is because timestamp operations return '29 days':
>
> =# SELECT timestamp '2016-01-31' +interval '1 month' -timestamp '2016-01-31';
>  ?column?
> ----------
>  29 days
>
> You can also try the following, maybe it is appropriate for you:
>
> =# SELECT timestamp '2016-01-31' -timestamp '2016-01-31' +interval '1 month';
>  ?column?
> ----------
>  1 mon
>
> =# SELECT extract( month from justify_days( timestamp '2016-01-31'
> -timestamp '2016-01-31' +interval '1 month') );
>  date_part
> -----------
>          1
>
> --
> Arthur Zakirov
> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
> Russian Postgres Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Arthur Zakirov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14850: Implement optinal additinal parameter for'justify' date/time function
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: [BUGS] Improper const-evaluation of HAVING with grouping sets and subquerypullup