Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Дата
Msg-id 21290.1120162944@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> What I'm confused about is that this shouldn't be anything new for 8.1.  Yet 
> 8.1 has *worse* performance on the STP machines than 8.0 does, and it's 
> pretty much entirely due to this check.

That's simply not believable --- better recheck your analysis.  If 8.1
is worse it's not because of page-dumping, because we are more efficient
on that than before not less so.  Perhaps there's another issue?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Larry Rosenman
Дата:
Сообщение: REL7_4_STABLE: Check failure
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Backend working directories and absolute file paths