I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> There's one other related thing I'm concerned about, which is that the
>> code in namespace.c that manages pg_temp doesn't know anything about
>> parallelism. So it will interpret pg_temp to mean the pg_temp_NNN
>> schema for its own backend ID rather than the leader's backend ID.
>> I'm not sure that's a problem, but I haven't thought deeply about it.
> Hmmm. I'll take a look.
Yeah, that was pretty broken, but I believe I've fixed it.
regards, tom lane