Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> No, it *isn't* cheap. �Particularly not for COPY, for which we need an
>> ad-hoc parser in psql.
> :-( That's definitely a complication, although it seems to me it will
> need substantial work no matter what option we decide on.
True :-(. But I'm hoping we only have to revise it once more, not every
time somebody thinks of another COPY option.
regards, tom lane