On 27.08.23 14:05, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
> On Friday, August 25, 2023 5:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:38 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25.08.23 08:52, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:
>>>> On Friday, August 25, 2023 12:28 PM Amit Kapila
>> <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 12:45 PM Peter Eisentraut
>>>>> <peter@eisentraut.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suggest we rename this setting to something starting with debug_.
>>>>>> Right now, the name looks much too tempting for users to fiddle with.
>>>>>> I think this is similar to force_parallel_mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1. How about debug_logical_replication?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, the descriptions in guc_tables.c could be improved. For
>>>>>> example,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gettext_noop("Controls when to replicate or apply each
>>>>>> change."),
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is pretty content-free and unhelpful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The other possibility I could think of is to change short_desc as:
>>>>> "Allows to replicate each change for large transactions.". Do you
>>>>> have any better ideas?
>>>>
>>>> How about "Forces immediate streaming or serialization of changes in
>>>> large transactions." which is similar to the description in document.
>>>>
>>>> I agree that renaming it to debug_xx would be better and here is a
>>>> patch that tries to do this.
>>>
>>> Maybe debug_logical_replication is too general? Something like
>>> debug_logical_replication_streaming would be more concrete.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, that sounds better.
>
> OK, here is the debug_logical_replication_streaming version.
committed