Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter
Дата
Msg-id 2234967.1651616526@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter  (Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com>)
Ответы Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter  (Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения 
Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com> writes:
> The DO block runs without error and reports "INFO:  42". This is an unambiguous semantic error because "a" is
declared"constant". 

> Is this a known issue?

It is, see

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=ccd10a9bf

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bryn Llewellyn
Дата:
Сообщение: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter
Следующее
От: Bryn Llewellyn
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter