Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution
Дата
Msg-id 22644.1489695423@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> writes:
> I reworked the test such that all of the foreign tables inherit from the
> same parent table, and if you query that you do get async execution. But It
> doesn't work when just stringing together those foreign tables with UNION
> ALLs.

> I don't know how to proceed with this review if that was a goal of the
> patch.

Whether it was a goal or not, I'd say there is something either broken
or incorrectly implemented if you don't see that.  The planner (and
therefore also the executor) generally treats inheritance the same as
simple UNION ALL.  If that's not the case here, I'd want to know why.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Size vs size_t