Re: having clause question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: having clause question
Дата
Msg-id 22896.1099177941@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: having clause question  (Ian Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Ian Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:17:16 -0700, Shane Wegner
> <shane-keyword-pgsql.a1e0d9@cm.nu> wrote:
>> Under MySQL, this query does the trick.
>> select lastname,count(*) as c from names group by lastname
>> having c > 1;
>>
>> Is it possible to do a query like this with PostgreSQL?

> select lastname,count(*) as c from names group by lastname having count(*) > 1;

Just to expand on that: MySQL's abbrevation is not legal SQL, and it's
not even very sensible, because logically speaking the SELECT output
list is only evaluated after (and if) the HAVING clause succeeds.
So it makes no sense for the HAVING clause to refer to SELECT values.

Postgres does optimize the case of multiple identical aggregate-function
invocations in a query, BTW, so the apparent inefficiency is not real.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ian Barwick
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: having clause question
Следующее
От: Ken Tozier
Дата:
Сообщение: Superuser log-in through a web interface?