Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Дата
Msg-id 22941.1535135908@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-08-24 14:09:09 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> However, we only support VS2017 down to 9.6 and Vs2015 down to 9.5. Perhaps
>> we should consider backpatching support for those down to 9.3.

> Hm, I have no strong objections to that.   I don't think it's strictly
> necessary, given 2013 is supported across the board, but for the non MSVC
> world, we do fix compiler issues in older branches.  There's not that
> much code for the newer versions afaict?

+1 for taking a look at how big a patch it would be.  But I kind of
thought we'd intentionally rejected back-patching some of those changes
to begin with, so I'm not sure the end decision will change.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Accidental removal of a file causing various problems