Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Apr 4, 2022, at 1:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Perhaps libpq should be trying harder to make those cases look alike, but
>> this test is about server behavior not libpq behavior, so I'm inclined
>> to just make it lax.
> +1.
> I've gotten this test failure only a few times in perhaps the last six months, so if we narrow the opportunity for
testfailure without closing it entirely, we're just making the test failures that much harder to diagnose.
Done that way.
regards, tom lane