> On Oct 14, 2021, at 2:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> (a) Isn't that just holding open one connection, not the whole instance?
Yes.
> (b) Wouldn't finish()ing that connection cause the temp tables to be
> dropped, negating the entire point of the test?
The finish() would have to be the last line of the test.
> TBH, I seriously doubt this test case is worth expending buildfarm
> cycles on forevermore. I'm more than a bit tempted to just drop
> it, rather than also expending developer time figuring out why it's
> not as portable as it looks.
I'm curious if the test is indicating something about the underlying test system. Only one other test in the tree uses
background_psql(). I was hoping Andrew would have something to say about whether this is a bug with that function or
justuser error on my part.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company