Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Дата
Msg-id 24309.957464165@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> It occurred to me that this would be the likely symptom if a CREATE
> GROUP or ALTER GROUP command had neglected to update the indexes on
> pg_group.  However, I can't spot any such problem in the code nor
> cause it to happen by hand.  Anyone else have an idea?

After further looking, I notice that users.c is one of the few places
that will drop AccessExclusiveLock at heap_close time rather than
holding it till xact commit.  I wonder whether this is a bug...
it could allow another backend to get in and start vacuuming the file
before our updates have committed.  I am not sure that vacuum would do
the wrong thing in that case, but maybe so.  Comments anyone (Vadim?)

I also notice that there definitely is a glaring bug there:
write_password_file() leaks one kernel file descriptor each time it runs
(note the creat() call).  Alter enough pg_shadow entries in one session
and your backend stops working.  I think this is a "must fix" problem
--- any objections?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mitch Vincent"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )
Следующее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?