Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Дата
Msg-id 24772.1167939791@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
Список pgsql-patches
Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com> writes:
> Quoting wikipedia:
> "Adler-32 has a weakness for short messages with few hundred bytes,
>  because the checksums for these messages have a poor coverage of
>  the 32 available bits...Jonathan Stone discovered in 2001 that Adler-32
>  has a weakness...An extended explanation can be found in RFC 3309,
>  which mandates the use of CRC32 instead of Adler-32...."

[ looks at the RFC... ]  Yeah, so that pretty much kills it for WAL
entries, which are mostly short.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron Mayer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Следующее
От: Florian Weimer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off