Re: BUG #6092: specific casting required for gist indexing of bigint

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #6092: specific casting required for gist indexing of bigint
Дата
Msg-id 25123.1309979805@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #6092: specific casting required for gist indexing of bigint  (Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com> writes:
> On 07/05/11 17:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Jeff Frost" <jeff@pgexperts.com> writes:
>>> Ran into a situation with a customer who is using the btree_gist contrib
>>> module to allow combined index of some tsearch data and two other columns.
>>> One of these other columns is a bigint field.  I noticed that the combined
>>> index won't be used by the planner unless you specifically cast the bare
>>> number to a bigint.

>> If memory serves, the btree_gist opclasses don't include any cross-type
>> operators, so "int8 = int4" doesn't work here.

> Ah! And if you look at the contrib/btree_gist/sql/int8.sql test file, you'll
> see this:
> SELECT count(*) FROM int8tmp WHERE a <  464571291354841::int8;
> So, I'd say it's expected behavior even though it's slightly counter intuitive
> if you're used to the auto typing behavior.

Well, it might be nice to fix it sometime, but I'd characterize it as an
unimplemented feature in btree_gist, not a bug.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: PG regression with row comparison when btree_gist is enabled (BUG)
Следующее
От: "wbc"
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #6093: timeout