Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Дата
Msg-id 25360.1457539350@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> On latest commit-51c0f63e, I am seeing some issues w.r.t parallel query.
> Consider a below case:

> create table t1(c1 int, c2 char(1000));
> insert into t1 values(generate_series(1,300000),'aaaa');
> analyze t1;
> set max_parallel_degree=2;
> postgres=# explain select c1, count(c1) from t1 where c1 < 1000 group by c1;
> ERROR:  ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in targetlist

Hm.  That does not speak well for the coverage of the "run the regression
tests with force_parallel_mode enabled" testing approach.

> Without setting max_parallel_degree, it works fine and generate the
> appropriate results.  Here the issue seems to be that the code in
> grouping_planner doesn't apply the required PathTarget to Path below Gather
> Path due to which when we generate target list for scan plan,

Yeah, fixed.  I had assumed that the existing coding in create_gather_plan
was OK, because it looked like it was right for a non-projecting node.
But actually Gather can project (why though?), so it's not right.

> Approach-2
> ------------------
> Always generate a tlist in Gather plan as we do for many other cases.  I
> think this approach will also resolve the issue but haven't tried yet.

I think this is the correct fix.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pushing down sorted joins
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Suspicious behaviour on applying XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE.