John Cochran <jdc@fiawol.org> writes:
> Point taken. I withdraw my patch. However, I'm going to examine date2j()
> and j2date() functions a bit closer and see if I can restructure them to
> eliminate the overflow problems they have. I would still like for those
> functions to be capable of dealing with the full range of available numbers.
Sure, that's worth doing in any case.
regards, tom lane