Re: initdb and fsync

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: initdb and fsync
Дата
Msg-id 26056.1342215306@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: initdb and fsync  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: initdb and fsync  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> I'm picking up this patch now.  What I'm inclined to do about the -N
> business is to commit without that, so that we get a round of testing
> in the buildfarm and find out about any portability issues, but then
> change to use -N after a week or so.  I agree that in the long run
> we don't want regression tests to run with fsyncs by default.

Committed without the -N in pg_regress (for now).  I also stuck
sync_file_range into the backend's pg_flush_data --- it would be
interesting to hear measurements of whether that makes a noticeable
difference for CREATE DATABASE.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Следующее
От: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework