Re: BUG #6076: Unexpected "Security Definer / invoker" interaction

"Dave Fennell" <dave@microtux.co.uk> writes:
> I would expect that if a function defined as "security definer" calls a
> function defined as "security invoker" the "invoker" role used would be the
> "definer" of the first function?

So would I.

> However it appears that the *actual*
> invoker (current user) is used.

You did not provide any evidence of that.  Please show a *complete*
self-contained test case.

            regards, tom lane