Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bo Anderson
Тема Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0
Дата
Msg-id 26144D95-62C4-465A-82CA-48A0BEA79E82@boanderson.me
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Список pgsql-hackers
It was first added in SSLeay 0.8.1 which predates OpenSSL let alone the LibreSSL fork.

It probably doesn’t exist in BoringSSL but neither does a lot of things.

> On 28 Nov 2023, at 00:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>> Interesting.  I have yet to look at that in details, but
>> BIO_get_app_data() exists down to 0.9.8, which is the oldest version
>> we need to support for stable branches.  So that looks like a safe
>> bet.
> 
> What about LibreSSL?  In general, I'm not too pleased with just assuming
> that BIO_get_app_data exists.  If we can do that, we can probably remove
> most of the OpenSSL function probes that configure.ac has today.  Even
> if that's a good idea in HEAD, I doubt we want to do it all the way back.
> 
> I'd be inclined to form the patch more along the lines of
> s/BIO_get_data/BIO_get_app_data/g, with a configure check for
> BIO_get_app_data and falling back to the existing direct use of
> bio->ptr if it's not there.
> 
>            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0
Следующее
От: "Tristan Partin"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0