Re: writing new regexp functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: writing new regexp functions
Дата
Msg-id 26162.1170467791@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: writing new regexp functions  (Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com>)
Ответы Re: writing new regexp functions  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com> writes:
> I want to ask, should I break with following substring's precedent, and
> put the pattern first (as most people probably would expect), or should I
> break with perl's precedent and put the pattern second (to behave like
> substring)?

All of SQL's pattern match operators have the pattern on the right, so
my advice is to stick with that and try not to think about Perl ;-)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Florian G. Pflug"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Referential Integrity and SHARE locks
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: writing new regexp functions