Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's not what I had in mind by "decoupling" the option's effects.
> Well, regardless of that it does what I want, and with a fairly small
> amount of code.
Well, yeah, because you are paying no mind to what anyone else might
want.
> I can make it work only in the pretty print case, if that's your objection.
I think that's back where we started in this thread. I can live with
it, but I thought some other people were unhappy with the idea of many
lines of targetlist...
regards, tom lane